Ben Witherington critiques Bart Ehrman

April 8, 2009

This is probably the best critique of Erhman in a blog post that I have ever come across!  Thanks Dr. Witherington!!!


Review of _Putting Jesus in His Place_

January 11, 2008

Putting Jesus in His Place: the Case for the Deity of Christ.
By Robert Bowman, Jr. and J. Ed Komoszewski. Kregel, 2007: 392 pages.

“But who do you say that I am” (Matt. 16:15)? Arguably the most important question one must face, Jesus forces his hearers to contemplate his divine identity. That Jesus is “begotten of the Father as only begotten, that is, from the essence of the Father, God from God, Light from Light, true God from true God” (Nicene Creed) is absolutely central to the Christian faith. It is, however, a widely rejected belief. For example, John Dominic Crossan, former co-chair of the infamous Jesus Seminar, defines references to Jesus as the “Lamb of God” as “symbolic…figurative…metaphorical.” Similar denials may be found in John Hick’s The Myth of God Incarnate.
In response, Robert Bowman Jr., manager of Apologetics and Interfaith Evangelism for the North American Mission Board, and J. Ed Komoszewski, founder of Christus Nexus and Director of Reclaiming the Mind Ministries, have written the clearest, most comprehensive and convincing case for the deity of Christ available. Though concerned to demonstrate Christ’s divinity from the New Testament, the authors are equally concerned to equip their readers to remember the material. They thus employ their innovative HANDS acronym (as they say, Jesus shares the HANDS of God), organizing the biblical teachings into five corresponding categories. Read the rest of this entry »


Thomas Madden responds to “Jesus Tomb” documentary

October 31, 2007

See it here (Fox 2 News, St Louis (Mar. 5, 2007).


Richard Hayes vs. Bart Ehrman on the Da Vinci Code (25 April 2006)

October 18, 2007

Listen to the debate here.


An abundance of bachelors!…and then came Jesus?

January 6, 2007

702augustus.jpgThe first character in Luke’s Christmas account to be mentioned is not Mary, Joseph, a shepherd, or even wise men for that matter. It was Caesar Augustus. But why? Scholars see this as typical of Lukan writing since he often attempted to anchor down his material with the secular history of his day. Read the rest of this entry »


Why don’t you guys ever post non-technical stuff?

December 21, 2006

If only I had a dollar for every time… Well, the short answer is that we’re all students and/or professors at our respective graduate schools, which has the unfortunate side effects of (1) leaving us very little spare time to take on projects unrelated to school [most of what appears on the blog is condensed versions of school work] and (2) keeping us occupied mentally with said school work.
Read the rest of this entry »


Review of ‘Studying the Historical Jesus: A Guide To Sources and Methods’

July 29, 2006

Studying the Historical Jesus: A Guide To Sources and Methods
Darrell L. Bock. Baker Academic, 2002; 230 pages.

Darrell Bock, Research Professor in New Testament Studies at Dallas Theological Seminary, has distinguished himself as a preeminent scholar in his field, especially with his two-volume commentary on Luke (BECNT, 1994-96). His Studying the Historical Jesus is a primer for the beginning student of the Gospels and Historical Jesus studies in general. Read the rest of this entry »